Blog

Why do we put tears in our soldiers' eyes


Very briefly, the article talks about the general apathy in India towards our soldiers. It also refers to an oft-heard refrain by many that soldiers have chosen their profession and are paid for the risk. Lt. Gen. Hasnain says, “No one expects the nation to come to a grinding halt every other day when a braveheart loses his life in a conflict situation battling the nation’s enemies, nor does one need banners to announce such news; all that is asked for is an acknowledgement of the sacrifice, a few words of remorse and empathy towards the families who have lost their all.”

While the write-up made me think deeply, my own friend’s remark made me feel ashamed as a citizen of India. While forwarding the article, he asked, why are we (soldiers) pleading if it (recognition) is not there?

What makes a fine officer of the Indian Army say that - or even think that? Someone who has been bestowed with one of the highest military honours for bravery in combat? That emotion could only come from receiving apathy, neglect and disconnect from us – the People of India. We, the People of India have failed him and ourselves - for India is defended by Indian soldiers and not soldiers from any other nation. They are us. Soldiers exist because a nation exists. Take away the idea of a nation and you take away the need for national defence and national armies and the need for men and women to lay down their lives to defend a nation. Therefore, shouldn't a nation feel some obligations towards its soldiers? Does my friend (or one of our countless other soldiers) deserves to feel like that? If any soldier feels neglected, unrecognised or forgotten, it is we, the People of India who must reflect on what has become of us.

Indeed, the argument that soldiers are paid for their sacrifices is revolting. A doctor is generally considered next to God even though, in most cases, we pay through our noses to get treatment. Yet, a doctor is respected - we encourage our children to become doctors - precisely because there is a possibility of earning much more than an average soldier would earn (and no threat of death in action). A banker is also paid (and rather well) and retains a place in our modern pantheon of "achievers". A VP of a bank would be holding equivalent organisational stature and responsibilities as a CO in armed forces but as a society, the VP is more "valuable". We as a society even pay him several times more. Should this not be a matter of some concern?

Are we, as a society becoming too commercialised? We have a tradition of “Gurur-Brahmaa Gurur-Vissnnur-Gururdevo Maheshvarah |Gurureva Param Brahma Tasmai Shrii-Gurave Namah ||” (The Guru is Brahma, the Guru is Vishnu, the Guru Deva is Maheshwara, The Guru is truly the Para-Bramha; Salutations to that Guru). But today, are we pushing our kids to become teachers? It just doesn't pay and hence it is no longer a "respected" or cared for profession. Is a soldier's profession another victim of our increasingly crassly commercial attitude?

One of the attributes of a nation-state is sovereignty and its ability to defend its boundaries against external threats. Not every citizen is required to do so because a few choose to do that job. But their choice is not the same as the act of choosing any another profession like law, or films, or brokering or any other. By making that choice, it renders a soldier special for the nation because this choice enables others to be free to choose other jobs or professions. It's not that any profession is anything less, it's just that some professions deserve being treated as something more.

No one in today’s world is born a doctor or lawyer or actor or soldier. Personal inclinations, capabilities, circumstances and opportunities place people in different professions. But the profession of a soldier requires him to kill or die for his nation – a requirement that doesn’t exist for any other profession barring the paramilitary/CPOs. Perhaps the only other even more difficult profession is espionage/intelligence. They are supposed to be soldiers but without a face – not even known or acknowledged. So why is it difficult for us to accept this difference and add respect and recognition over and above the "CTC" or monetary compensation we pay them as a society or a nation? What makes us “respect” and “recognise” someone who entertains us more than someone who is willing to kill for us – so that our own hands remain clean or die so that we may live in peace?

Is it because in India we are blasé about people dying? It is interesting to read the National Crime Record Bureau Report (NCRB) 2012. Pg. 531 of the Report gives figures for 2012 alone as: 68676 recorded murders, death due to negligence 87334, 78 killed in police firing, 821 police personnel killed of which 83 by terrorists/militants and 61 by other criminals. At the same time, reports in public domain indicate 11 military casualties during 2011. So have we become benumbed? Because thousands are getting killed or are killing, where roads in the Red Corridor are strewn with corpses of policemen and civilians killed by Maoists each year, we have no value for the soldier who does so for a higher cause? Are we treating death in line of duty by a soldier in the same category as a murder?

Are these commercial reasons and societal disdain the cause of massive shortage of officers in our armed forces? A shortage of 20-25% at officer level is a serious problem. Quite clearly, kids today are no longer interested in that career. Is it because they see the disdain in their parents' eyes? Is it because the lure of money has been perpetrated and encouraged? Is it because our society portrays our soldiers as bumbling fools who dash off to play war games and die whenever signalled while the rest of us "smarter lot" get on with improving our standard of living, acquiring wealth, giving foreign education to our children so that they can earn even better than us?

Does that soldier not contribute to providing secure environment to enable our betterment? How much should that convert to in commercial terms? If the society doesn't want to pay that much, is it possible to compensate a bit by giving some respect, recognition and love? Those things don't cost. Or have we become a people who want to give nothing - even if it costs us nothing? Or do we begrudge them something? What?

There's no point convincing ourselves that actually the soldier is given enough till the time the soldier looks downcast. Do we think giving medals, uniform, his ration of few eggs and butter, the facilities of defence canteen, orderlies, dancing of film stars amongst jawans, sonorous debates on the TV when a soldier dies, giving a gun-salute and such other things enough "payment"? How many of us would trade all that with our lives when the occasion demands? If a soldier feels bad, feels unwanted, neglected - there's something wrong.

I have interacted with many people in the armed forces but none who feels the nation is giving them their due. Can all of them be wrong? If so, they can only be extremely self-centred and greedy people for whom the phrase, 'Ye dil maangey more' means nothing more than a soft drink salesman's desire to earn more by way of bonus by selling more and perhaps also being given the 'Salesman of the Year Award'. Then our soldiers must all be Gordon Geckos for whom "greed is good".

But why would such "greedy" souls lay down their lives for the nation?

Or do we need to look into our own benumbed, commercial souls and answer the question, "Why do our soldiers feel unhappy and neglected?"

I don't know how will our attitude change. I don't know how to bring that happy smile on my soldier's face. And that's a thorn in my side.

I must end with these lines from Makhanlal Chaturvedi to help us reflect:

चाह नहीं मैं सुरबाला के गहनों में गूँथा जाऊँ

चाह नहीं, प्रेमी-माला में बिंध प्यारी को ललचाऊँ

चाह नहीं, सम्राटों के शव पर हे हरि, डाला जाऊँ

चाह नहीं, देवों के सिर पर चढ़ूँ भाग्य पर इठलाऊँ

मुझे तोड़ लेना वनमाली उस पथ पर देना तुम फेंक

मातृभूमि पर शीश चढ़ाने जिस पर जावें वीर अनेक ।।
.................
TRANSLATION:

"The Yearning of a Flower Desireth not to be on the young lass’ Tresses…living twice all over,

Desireth not to be in a garland Binding, enticing young lovers,

Desireth not to rest on the mortals Of Emperors – aren’t we equally God’s own?

Desireth not to be on the heads of Gods To take pride in mere fortune,

Pick me out, O Gardener!

Strew me on the path that the Brave tread To sacrifice for Motherland!

Let me, in obeisance, bow my head!"

View All

Comments


Leave a Comment

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk * indicates a required field.